Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 104: Line 104:  
One of the most common [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]] atheists, [[agnosticism|agnostics]] and [[evolution]]ists employ is the [[fallacy of exclusion]].  For example, the [[evolution]]ist Dr. Scott Todd, an immunologist at [[Kansas State University]], wrote: "Even if all the data point to an [[Intelligent design|intelligent designer]], such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not [[naturalism|naturalistic]]".<ref>http://creation.com/a-designer-is-unscientificeven-if-all-the-evidence-supports-one</ref> See: [[Methodological naturalism]] and [[Atheism and naturalistic intelligence]]
 
One of the most common [[logical fallacy|logical fallacies]] atheists, [[agnosticism|agnostics]] and [[evolution]]ists employ is the [[fallacy of exclusion]].  For example, the [[evolution]]ist Dr. Scott Todd, an immunologist at [[Kansas State University]], wrote: "Even if all the data point to an [[Intelligent design|intelligent designer]], such an hypothesis is excluded from science because it is not [[naturalism|naturalistic]]".<ref>http://creation.com/a-designer-is-unscientificeven-if-all-the-evidence-supports-one</ref> See: [[Methodological naturalism]] and [[Atheism and naturalistic intelligence]]
   −
List of logical fallacies that atheists commonly commit: [[[Atheism and logical fallacies]]
+
List of logical fallacies that atheists commonly commit: [[Atheism and logical fallacies]]
    
== Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of belief in the existence of God ==
 
== Irrationality of the atheism and the logic of belief in the existence of God ==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729

edits

Navigation menu