nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
26,487
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 42:
Line 42: + +
→Conservapedia:Abuse
:: Geo.prld asked me why I posted it; I was answering him. His talk page seemed an appropriate place (the other obvious choice being my talk page, where he asked; I chose his so that he was more likely to see the answer quickly). And no, you obviously don't have to explain your choices, but seeing as how you did once (or at least appeared to), I thought you might choose to again. Removing a comment for not being signed, if you would have removed it even if it was signed, doesn't exactly appear to be forthright. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 21:32, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
:: Geo.prld asked me why I posted it; I was answering him. His talk page seemed an appropriate place (the other obvious choice being my talk page, where he asked; I chose his so that he was more likely to see the answer quickly). And no, you obviously don't have to explain your choices, but seeing as how you did once (or at least appeared to), I thought you might choose to again. Removing a comment for not being signed, if you would have removed it even if it was signed, doesn't exactly appear to be forthright. --[[User:Jtl|Jtl]] 21:32, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
::*Pot, kettle? You merely did it to stir the pot. You have been warned, now. The "Abuse" is not a vehicle for your (or anyone else's) idealogical battles. If you think posting about Andy there embarasses him, you are really misguided. --~ [[User:TK|<sup>Sysop-</sup>TK]] <sub>[[User_talk:TK|/MyTalk]]</sub> 21:37, 18 April 2007 (EDT)