Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 914:
Line 914: + +
Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words (view source)
Revision as of 18:39, June 14, 2015
, 18:39, June 14, 2015→De Minimis
:::I don't think the source of the word is dispositive. It is conservative to look beyond materialism to a greater truth. "[[Opportunity cost]]" is an example, which is also on the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:36, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
:::I don't think the source of the word is dispositive. It is conservative to look beyond materialism to a greater truth. "[[Opportunity cost]]" is an example, which is also on the list.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 19:36, 13 June 2015 (EDT)
::::Sorry, for a short moment I took your concept of [[Best New Conservative Words]] serious again. Then I read [[Talk:Essay:Best New Conservative Words#Recount]] again, and the memory came back: ''not "false", but lacking in a perfect understanding'' must be the conservative version of ''fake, but accurate''... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 14:39, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
== Recount, again... ==
== Recount, again... ==
I copied the list into a spreadsheet and counted the lines: '''592'''. The ''official'' count is '''591'''. Four years ago [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&diff=884298&oldid=884020 I tried to add a fourth numeric column] containing the decade of the creation (or perhaps just the century) to facilitate a count, as at the moment the column ''origin date'' isn't purely numeric. This was deleted. So I'm not inclined to put any work into a manual recount. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:36, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
I copied the list into a spreadsheet and counted the lines: '''592'''. The ''official'' count is '''591'''. Four years ago [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Essay:Best_New_Conservative_Words&diff=884298&oldid=884020 I tried to add a fourth numeric column] containing the decade of the creation (or perhaps just the century) to facilitate a count, as at the moment the column ''origin date'' isn't purely numeric. This was deleted. So I'm not inclined to put any work into a manual recount. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 09:36, 14 June 2015 (EDT)