SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
388
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 19:
Line 19: + + + + + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 05:14, June 15, 2015
, 05:14, June 15, 2015→Just a tip...: new section
::::::Given the incremental character of the change, could you please answer the questions, '''assuming a constant speed of light for the duration of the experiment'''? Or if you think that the change of the speed of light has an influence on the experiment, please, just put up the relevant formulas: this should give us an opportunity to calculate the change of the speed of light over time!
::::::Given the incremental character of the change, could you please answer the questions, '''assuming a constant speed of light for the duration of the experiment'''? Or if you think that the change of the speed of light has an influence on the experiment, please, just put up the relevant formulas: this should give us an opportunity to calculate the change of the speed of light over time!
::::::Otherwise, quit stalling. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:51, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
::::::Otherwise, quit stalling. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:51, 14 June 2015 (EDT)
== Just a tip... ==
Articles claiming to highlight "logical flaws" in the ideas of others, probably shouldn't contain logical flaws of their own. As seen by this glaring example:
*if the formula were true, then why hasn't the formula led to anything of value?
--[[User:DonnyC|DonnyC]] 01:14, 15 June 2015 (EDT)