Changes

Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)

Revision as of 19:40, June 15, 2015

410 bytes added , 19:40, June 15, 2015

The meaning of such an experiment is nothing, particularly for logically flawed hypothesis.

Line 19: Line 19:

::::::Given the incremental character of the change, could you please answer the questions, '''assuming a constant speed of light for the duration of the experiment'''? Or if you think that the change of the speed of light has an influence on the experiment, please, just put up the relevant formulas: this should give us an opportunity to calculate the change of the speed of light over time!

::::::Otherwise, quit stalling. --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 16:51, 14 June 2015 (EDT)

+

:::::::August, I don't have the data from the experiment, and I wasn't there. But I don't doubt that an experiment can probably be developed, just as a broken clock can be found, to give a desired result or (in the case of a clock) a correct time of day. The meaning of such an experiment is nothing, particularly for logically flawed hypothesis.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 15:40, 15 June 2015 (EDT)

== Just a tip... ==

Aschlafly

Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators

126,196

edits

Changes

Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)

Revision as of 19:40, June 15, 2015

Navigation menu

Search