8
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 06:13, June 16, 2015
, 06:13, June 16, 2015→A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton
:::::::::By the way, do you think E=mc<span>2</span> would be true if the speed of light is changing over time?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:59, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
:::::::::By the way, do you think E=mc<span>2</span> would be true if the speed of light is changing over time?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 00:59, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
:::::::::::Hi Andy, I think you posted the wrong link. The nobel prize speech says "This assertion was satisfactorily confirmed by Cockcroft and Walton, experimental errors being taken into consideration. Somewhat later, more exact investigations based on the same principles gave a complete verification of Einstein's law." [[User:BradSmythe|BradSmythe]] 02:13, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
*All the necessary data of the experiment is listed at [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]. Please answer the questions.
*All the necessary data of the experiment is listed at [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]. Please answer the questions.