Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 07:18, June 16, 2015
, 07:18, June 16, 2015→A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton: "what is", not "what if"
:::::::::::Hi Andy, I think you posted the wrong link. The nobel prize speech says "This assertion was satisfactorily confirmed by Cockcroft and Walton, experimental errors being taken into consideration. Somewhat later, more exact investigations based on the same principles gave a complete verification of Einstein's law." [[User:BradSmythe|BradSmythe]] 02:13, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
:::::::::::Hi Andy, I think you posted the wrong link. The nobel prize speech says "This assertion was satisfactorily confirmed by Cockcroft and Walton, experimental errors being taken into consideration. Somewhat later, more exact investigations based on the same principles gave a complete verification of Einstein's law." [[User:BradSmythe|BradSmythe]] 02:13, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
::::::::::Andy, let's talk first about ''what is'' (ie.e, the experiment), and then about ''what if''! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 03:18, 16 June 2015 (EDT)
*All the necessary data of the experiment is listed at [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]. Please answer the questions.
*All the necessary data of the experiment is listed at [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]]. Please answer the questions.