Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 88: Line 88:  
As I demonstrated above via showing conflicting pieces of evidence concerning Hitler's religious views, there is a significant lack of certainty regarding Adolf Hitler's religious views. History can be cloudy sometimes due to fragmentary/conflicting pieces of evidence. Such is the case of Adolf Hitler's religious views. In such cases, one should resist imposing one's wishes on history and/or allowing [[confirmation bias]] to skew one's judgment.   
 
As I demonstrated above via showing conflicting pieces of evidence concerning Hitler's religious views, there is a significant lack of certainty regarding Adolf Hitler's religious views. History can be cloudy sometimes due to fragmentary/conflicting pieces of evidence. Such is the case of Adolf Hitler's religious views. In such cases, one should resist imposing one's wishes on history and/or allowing [[confirmation bias]] to skew one's judgment.   
   −
There is nothing wrong with saying "We don't know" or "there is uncertainty regarding....".  In cases of fragmentary/conflicting data, it is the most accurate thing to say.  
+
There is nothing wrong with saying "We don't know" or "there is uncertainty regarding...." when it is appropriate to say so.  And in cases of fragmentary/conflicting data, it is the most accurate thing to say.  
    
One should go where the evidence leads and not make a premature decision (due to various assumptions, inordinately weighting one variable too heavily, etc.)  and then look for evidence to support that conclusion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:04, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
 
One should go where the evidence leads and not make a premature decision (due to various assumptions, inordinately weighting one variable too heavily, etc.)  and then look for evidence to support that conclusion. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 03:04, 21 June 2015 (EDT)
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,891

edits

Navigation menu