Changes

::*''"That should tell you that this supposed law is probably unconfirmable given the limitations of our observations, "'' Every experiment we perform, every observation we make is limited by the accuracy of measurement. No reason to discard with physics!

::*''"That should tell you that this supposed law is probably unconfirmable given the limitations of our observations, "'' Every experiment we perform, every observation we make is limited by the accuracy of measurement. No reason to discard with physics!

::*''"but especially so for the limited observations of the experiment you are describing."'' To a certain extant, this experiment provides us with one data point - an observation consistent with E=mc². I'll gladly hear another explanation for the outcome of the experiment - this explanation can then be tested with other experiments (and there are many others out there...)

::*''"but especially so for the limited observations of the experiment you are describing."'' To a certain extant, this experiment provides us with one data point - an observation consistent with E=mc². I'll gladly hear another explanation for the outcome of the experiment - this explanation can then be tested with other experiments (and there are many others out there...)

::*''"This may be an example of bias on your part toward this particular experiment."'' I chose this experiment as it was discussed with Andrew Schlafly before. Therefore, I  hoped this would reduce the effort to answer my questions.

::*''"This may be an example of bias on your part toward this particular experiment."'' I chose this experiment as it was discussed with Andrew Schlafly before (I think, he even was the one to bring it up in the first place). Therefore, I  hoped this would reduce the effort to answer my questions.

::*''"You also haven't bothered to address the logical flaws of E=mc2 that are actually presented by Andy in this article."'' As I stated above: I will address them the moment Andrew Schlafly has answered the [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]].  

::*''"You also haven't bothered to address the logical flaws of E=mc2 that are actually presented by Andy in this article."'' As I stated above: I will address them the moment Andrew Schlafly has answered the [[Talk:E=mc²#A few questions for Aschlafly regarding the experiment of Cockcroft and Walton]].  

::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:31, 24 June 2015 (EDT)

::--[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 19:31, 24 June 2015 (EDT)