Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 108:
Line 108: + +
Talk:Logical Flaws in E=mc² (view source)
Revision as of 05:16, June 29, 2015
, 05:16, June 29, 2015→Conspiracy Theory: @SamHB
::AugustO, I congratulate you on your clear understanding of the issues involved. From your writing above, you seem to have a good understanding of the derivative of x<sup>3</sup>, and of its connection with accuracy in physical measurements. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:36, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
::AugustO, I congratulate you on your clear understanding of the issues involved. From your writing above, you seem to have a good understanding of the derivative of x<sup>3</sup>, and of its connection with accuracy in physical measurements. [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] 00:36, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
:::SamHB, how flattering, but I think you wanted to congratulate VargasMilan for this tremendous achievement! --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 01:16, 29 June 2015 (EDT)
== Just a tip... ==
== Just a tip... ==