Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
410 bytes added ,  09:26, July 5, 2015
Line 141: Line 141:     
“A less moral framework is atheism,” started Craig with an exasperated laugh, and then went on to point out that Harris had said nothing to defend an atheistic foundation for morality, nor to refute Craig’s own arguments. To demonstrate how poorly Harris understood Christianity, and how irrelevant his “arguments” were, Craig quipped, in regards to Harris’s claim that the goal on theism is to avoid hell, “Belief in God isn’t some kind of fire insurance.” He then went on to list a number of other ways in which the red herrings that Harris had laid across the path were irrelevant—which was fair enough since there wasn’t much else to say.<ref>[http://thinkingmatters.org.nz/2011/04/how-william-lane-craig-thrashed-sam-harris-like-a-naughty-puppy/ How William Lane Craig thrashed Sam Harris like a naughty puppy], Thinking Matters (New Zealand Christian Apologetics Ministry), April 9, 2011</ref>}}
 
“A less moral framework is atheism,” started Craig with an exasperated laugh, and then went on to point out that Harris had said nothing to defend an atheistic foundation for morality, nor to refute Craig’s own arguments. To demonstrate how poorly Harris understood Christianity, and how irrelevant his “arguments” were, Craig quipped, in regards to Harris’s claim that the goal on theism is to avoid hell, “Belief in God isn’t some kind of fire insurance.” He then went on to list a number of other ways in which the red herrings that Harris had laid across the path were irrelevant—which was fair enough since there wasn’t much else to say.<ref>[http://thinkingmatters.org.nz/2011/04/how-william-lane-craig-thrashed-sam-harris-like-a-naughty-puppy/ How William Lane Craig thrashed Sam Harris like a naughty puppy], Thinking Matters (New Zealand Christian Apologetics Ministry), April 9, 2011</ref>}}
 +
 +
Other reviews by Christians:
 +
 +
*[http://rightreason.org/2011/debate-review-william-lane-craig-and-sam-harris/ Debate Review: William Lane Craig and Sam Harris]
 +
 +
*[http://www.randyeverist.com/2011/04/review-of-craig-vs-harris-debate.html Review of Craig vs. Harris Debate] by Randy Ecerest
 +
 +
*[http://jwwartick.com/2011/04/08/harris-craig/ Sam Harris vs. William Lane Craig: Thoughts and Links] by J.W. Wartick
    
==== Review of the debate by the atheist Luke Muehlhauser at Common Sense Atheism ====
 
==== Review of the debate by the atheist Luke Muehlhauser at Common Sense Atheism ====
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,827

edits

Navigation menu