Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:     
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never expressly mentioned "third-party doctrine," but many federal and state appellate courts have invoked it.
 
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never expressly mentioned "third-party doctrine," but many federal and state appellate courts have invoked it.
 +
 +
== Administrative subpoenas ==
 +
 +
Administrative subpoenas are used by the government without a warrant more often than most people realize.  NSA gathers its metadata based on third-party doctrine.<ref>http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/the-progressive-roots-of-nsas-privacy-violations/article/2566725</ref>
 +
 +
== References ==
 +
 +
<references/>
 
[[Category:criminal law]]
 
[[Category:criminal law]]
 
[[Category:law]]
 
[[Category:law]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,298

edits

Navigation menu