Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 31: Line 31:     
:I read the article.  Walker's support of a pie-in-the-sky constitutional amendment is for cosmetic purposes.  It's obvious he's not going to speak out against the [[homosexual agenda]] or issue any order to block enforcement of ''[Obergefell]]''.  This article in Politico is more informative about Walker's weakness on the issue: "Walker goes mum on same-sex marriage." [http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/scott-walker-silent-constitutional-amendment-states-gay-marriage-119505.html]
 
:I read the article.  Walker's support of a pie-in-the-sky constitutional amendment is for cosmetic purposes.  It's obvious he's not going to speak out against the [[homosexual agenda]] or issue any order to block enforcement of ''[Obergefell]]''.  This article in Politico is more informative about Walker's weakness on the issue: "Walker goes mum on same-sex marriage." [http://www.politico.com/story/2015/06/scott-walker-silent-constitutional-amendment-states-gay-marriage-119505.html]
 +
 +
== See also ''Candidates on homosexuality'' ==
 +
 +
No links to their positions on actual issues that matter? [[User:IsabellW|IsabellW]] 13:48, 1 August 2015 (EDT)
1,083

edits

Navigation menu