Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎False experimental claims: improvement as suggested re: fission v. fusion
Line 17: Line 17:  
== False experimental claims ==
 
== False experimental claims ==
   −
It is common for [[atheist]]s to claim that E=mc² is proven by what are, in fact, ordinary chemical reactions that emit energy.  Nuclear-fission reactions, such as the transformation of hydrogen to helium, do not demonstrate any connection between the rest energy of a mass and the speed of light, as E=mc² asserts.
+
It is common for [[atheist]]s to claim that E=mc² is proven by what are, in fact, ordinary chemical reactions that emit energy.  Nuclear-fusion reactions, such as the transformation of hydrogen to helium, do not demonstrate any connection between the rest energy of a mass and the speed of light, as E=mc² asserts.
    
Broken clocks are correct twice a day, and some isolated experiments have asserted verification of E=mc² in certain carefully framed scenarios.  But no experiment has demonstrated E=mc² with any reasonable degree of generality.
 
Broken clocks are correct twice a day, and some isolated experiments have asserted verification of E=mc² in certain carefully framed scenarios.  But no experiment has demonstrated E=mc² with any reasonable degree of generality.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,565

edits

Navigation menu