Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
170 bytes added ,  04:26, August 8, 2015
no edit summary
Line 12: Line 12:  
::::2. Whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring that employees affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech.  
 
::::2. Whether it violates the First Amendment to require that public employees affirmatively object to subsidizing nonchargeable speech by public-sector unions, rather than requiring that employees affirmatively consent to subsidizing such speech.  
 
*[[Eighth Amendment]] ([[capital punishment]]) - 4 cases, three of which will be argued together
 
*[[Eighth Amendment]] ([[capital punishment]]) - 4 cases, three of which will be argued together
−
*[[affirmative action]] case, on its second trip to the Supreme Court, in ''Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin'', No. 14-981  
+
*[[affirmative action]] case, on its second trip to the Supreme Court, in ''Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin'', No. 14-981
 +
*two voting rights cases, relating to the concept of "one man, one vote."  ''Evenwel v. Abbott'', No. 14-940, and ''Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin'', No. 14-981.
    
Perhaps surprisingly, there are no [[Fourth Amendment]] cases among the 35.
 
Perhaps surprisingly, there are no [[Fourth Amendment]] cases among the 35.
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,231

edits

Navigation menu