Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Corker law (view source)

Revision as of 16:54, August 8, 2015

88 bytes added ,  16:54, August 8, 2015
The U.S. Supreme Court has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.
Line 1: Line 1:  
The '''Corker Bill''' is a misguided bill that circumvents the [[Treaty Clause]] in the [[U.S. Constitution]], and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one.
 
The '''Corker Bill''' is a misguided bill that circumvents the [[Treaty Clause]] in the [[U.S. Constitution]], and essentially requires not a 2/3rds vote to ratify a foreign treaty, but a 2/3rds vote to reject one.
 +
 +
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:politics]]
 
[[category:government]]
 
[[category:government]]
 
[[category:United States Constitution]]
 
[[category:United States Constitution]]
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,196

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1167781"

Navigation menu