5
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − − The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach. + + + +
constitutionality
Only one senator voted against this law: [[Tom Cotton]], who explains that it violates the Constitution. He explained:<ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/241355-senate-votes-to-approve-Iran-review-bill</ref>
Only one senator voted against this law: [[Tom Cotton]], who explains that it violates the Constitution. He explained:<ref>http://thehill.com/blogs/floor-action/senate/241355-senate-votes-to-approve-Iran-review-bill</ref>
{{cquote|A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary—especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution.}}
{{cquote|A nuclear-arms agreement with any adversary—especially the terror-sponsoring, Islamist Iranian regime—should be submitted as a treaty and obtain a two-thirds majority vote in the Senate as required by the Constitution.}}
== Background ==
== Background ==
Senator [[Bob Corker]], a [[RINO]] from [[Tennessee]], introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the [[Obama Administration]] with [[Iran]].
Senator [[Bob Corker]], a [[RINO]] from [[Tennessee]], introduced this bill as a compromise with respect to the proposed deal being negotiated by the [[Obama Administration]] with [[Iran]].
== Constitutionality ==
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has never addressed the constitutionality of this approach.
== References ==
== References ==