Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Talk:Age of the Earth (view source)

Revision as of 17:37, August 29, 2015

184 bytes added ,  17:37, August 29, 2015
→‎Not off by up to five orders of magnitude: Fabulous catch. I've removed the incorrect statement implying an old earth. Thank you.
Line 93: Line 93:  
I'd like to ask whether this sentence in the article makes sense: "Even so, such an error will not cause a calculation of the age of the Earth based on radiometric dating to be off by up to five orders of magnitude."
 
I'd like to ask whether this sentence in the article makes sense: "Even so, such an error will not cause a calculation of the age of the Earth based on radiometric dating to be off by up to five orders of magnitude."
 
If it should be kept, is it possible to at least attribute it to the correct source [that is convinced about the validity of the given proposition]?--[[User:AK|AK]] ([[User talk:AK|talk]]) 13:05, 29 August 2015 (EDT)
 
If it should be kept, is it possible to at least attribute it to the correct source [that is convinced about the validity of the given proposition]?--[[User:AK|AK]] ([[User talk:AK|talk]]) 13:05, 29 August 2015 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Fabulous catch.  I've removed the incorrect statement implying an old earth.  Thank you.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] ([[User talk:Aschlafly|talk]]) 13:37, 29 August 2015 (EDT)
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,367

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1169125"

Navigation menu