4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + + + + + + +
Conservapedia talk:Quality (view source)
Revision as of 18:18, April 19, 2007
, 18:18, April 19, 2007Biblical criticism
:Fantastic, Ed tries to conduct a survey to help this site, and Aschlafly finds a way to minimize the importance of the survey and throw out baseless arguments. Concise does not necessarily mean short. Me thinks Andy is confusing an encyclopedia with a dictionary. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 13:55, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
:Fantastic, Ed tries to conduct a survey to help this site, and Aschlafly finds a way to minimize the importance of the survey and throw out baseless arguments. Concise does not necessarily mean short. Me thinks Andy is confusing an encyclopedia with a dictionary. <font color="FFD700">[[User:ColinR|ColinR]]</font><sup><font color="000000">[[User_talk:ColinR|talk]]</font></sup> 13:55, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
== [[Biblical criticism]] ==
Was it [http://creationwiki.org/Biblical_criticism copied from CreationWiki]?
Probably not, but, darn it all, TerryH should have clearly indicated its provenance on [[Talk:Biblical cricicism]], currently a nonexistent page. Even if it is 100% valid, which I'm guessing it is, without a statement of origin and authorship this article has a quality problem in my opinion.
The CreationWiki article is the work of exactly two contributors, [http://creationwiki.org/index.php?title=Biblical_criticism&action=history Tsommer and Temlakos]. The Conservapedia article is by TerryH. The Conservapedia article is almost identical to the last revision by Temlakos and does not seem to include recent changes by Tsommer, so very likely TerryH is Temlakos and this is a dual submission. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 14:18, 19 April 2007 (EDT)