Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
14,684
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 43:
Line 43: + +
Talk:United States presidential election, 2016 (view source)
Revision as of 06:01, September 3, 2015
, 06:01, September 3, 2015→Pros and Cons: reply
::Of course, it was a bad decision to completely withdraw troops in 2011.But to be fair, the Islamic State would not exist in the first place if the U.S. would not have invaded the country to begin with. It is hardly elitist for Obama to have made that decision though, considering the vast majority of the American people had grown tired of "war".--[[User:Scatach|Scatach]] ([[User talk:Scatach|talk]]) 01:21, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
::Of course, it was a bad decision to completely withdraw troops in 2011.But to be fair, the Islamic State would not exist in the first place if the U.S. would not have invaded the country to begin with. It is hardly elitist for Obama to have made that decision though, considering the vast majority of the American people had grown tired of "war".--[[User:Scatach|Scatach]] ([[User talk:Scatach|talk]]) 01:21, 3 September 2015 (EDT)
:Those soldiers were there to wipe out terrorists. It's no accident that they came back in the same place. Removing all the troops wasn't just a bad decision, it made Donald Rumsfeld, to name one, very angry that Obama dismissed good military sense that would have cost a minimum of casualties like the troops kept in Germany after World War II. It was elitist to think the coalition troops weren't "authentic" enough to play a role in Iraq's emergence as a free nation. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 02:01, 3 September 2015 (EDT)