Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,916
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + +
Talk:Essay: New Atheist Kyle Kulinski defeated (view source)
Revision as of 14:53, September 14, 2015
, 14:53, September 14, 2015no edit summary
[[File:Richard Dawkins pic.jpg|alt=Richard Dawkins|thumbnail|260px|right|The [[Oxford University]] Professor [[Daniel Came]] wrote to the New Atheist [[Richard Dawkins]]:: "The absence of a debate with the foremost [[Christian apologetics|apologist]] for [[Christianity|Christian]] [[theism]] is a glaring omission on your [[Curriculum vitae|CV]] and is of course apt to be interpreted as cowardice on your part."<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/8511931/Richard-Dawkins-accused-of-cowardice-for-refusing-to-debate-existence-of-God.html Richard Dawkins accused of cowardice for refusing to debate existence of God], ''[[The Daily Telegraph]]'', May 14, 2011</ref>
<br />
<br />
Kulinski admires Richard Dawkins because he admires cowards and cowardice! Kulinski predictably ran away from Conservapedia's [[atheism vs. Christianity]] debate offer. ]]
Don't you think it would be better to let a 3rd party judge the result? Judging yourself is hardly unbiased. He took on all your points and answered them albeit in an uncouth manner, in fact he spent the best part of half an hour doing so and you come back with the exact same points you posted in your first debate essay. It is only a matter of time before he finds out about the $20000 fiasco and he will tear you to shreds about it forcing you to delete and over-site both essays in their entirety. You have proven you have a knowledgeable and at times insightful brain but I suggest you think before engaging it's gears.--[[User:ColeP|ColeP]] ([[User talk:ColeP|talk]]) 10:46, 14 September 2015 (EDT)
Don't you think it would be better to let a 3rd party judge the result? Judging yourself is hardly unbiased. He took on all your points and answered them albeit in an uncouth manner, in fact he spent the best part of half an hour doing so and you come back with the exact same points you posted in your first debate essay. It is only a matter of time before he finds out about the $20000 fiasco and he will tear you to shreds about it forcing you to delete and over-site both essays in their entirety. You have proven you have a knowledgeable and at times insightful brain but I suggest you think before engaging it's gears.--[[User:ColeP|ColeP]] ([[User talk:ColeP|talk]]) 10:46, 14 September 2015 (EDT)