Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect
30,891
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 22:
Line 22: + + + + + +
Talk:Philosophical naturalism (view source)
Revision as of 23:42, September 21, 2015
, 23:42, September 21, 2015→The concluding "Assessment" at end of article: new section
Is this because I have Windows 10? or is there a glitch in the Conservapedia system? Appreciate your help.<br/> --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 11:23, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
Is this because I have Windows 10? or is there a glitch in the Conservapedia system? Appreciate your help.<br/> --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 11:23, 18 September 2015 (EDT)
== The concluding "Assessment" at end of article ==
After reading the article as a whole, I became convinced it needed a concise conclusion that would tie all the information together succinctly from an informed Christian perspective to make the subject more clearly understandable and manageable, also to show where I stand. I believe those who take the trouble to look at the source materials in the External links and the Bibliography and reading list to check what I have written will concur with my assessment of the stupidity of philosophical (un)naturalism.
''Semper Fi'' --[[User:Dataclarifier|Dataclarifier]] ([[User talk:Dataclarifier|talk]]) 19:42, 21 September 2015 (EDT)