Changes

Philosophical naturalism has consistently shown itself to be a nonscientific [[Atheism is a religion|religious perspective]] that is adverse to impartial inquiry into the nature of reality according to the scientific principles of methodological naturalism. Its adherents and defenders have consistently shown by their writings and opinions a prejudicial intolerance of fundamentally human intuitive understandings of reality and an anti-intellectual rejection of compelling evidence that has proven acceptable to profound thinkers and researchers. It is not science, nor is it a scientific approach.

Philosophical naturalism has consistently shown itself to be a nonscientific [[Atheism is a religion|religious perspective]] that is adverse to impartial inquiry into the nature of reality according to the scientific principles of methodological naturalism. Its adherents and defenders have consistently shown by their writings and opinions a prejudicial intolerance of fundamentally human intuitive understandings of reality and an anti-intellectual rejection of compelling evidence that has proven acceptable to profound thinkers and researchers. It is not science, nor is it a scientific approach.

Philosophical naturalism represents an approach that is ''ipso facto'', by its ''a priori'' absolute rejection of the possibility of the supernatural, and in particular by its denial of the possibility of the bodily physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead and the existence of God, militantly anti-Christian, and overtly hostile to religion and to human culture.

''Ipso facto'', by its ''a priori'' absolute rejection of the possibility of the supernatural, and in particular by its denials of the possibility of the bodily physical resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead and the existence of God, philosophical naturalism represents an approach that is militantly anti-Christian, and overtly hostile to religion and to human culture.

== References==

== References==