Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
3,135
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + + +
+see also
==Examples==
==Examples==
*[http://www.rawstory.com/2015/02/supreme-court-lets-stand-ruling-that-firing-woman-for-breastfeeding-not-sexist-because-men-can-lactate/ "Woman out of appeals after trial court says her firing for breastfeeding not sexist since men can lactate"]--as [http://www.snopes.com/info/news/menlactate.asp Snopes points out], the headline is a gross distortion of the facts of the case
*[http://www.rawstory.com/2015/02/supreme-court-lets-stand-ruling-that-firing-woman-for-breastfeeding-not-sexist-because-men-can-lactate/ "Woman out of appeals after trial court says her firing for breastfeeding not sexist since men can lactate"]--as [http://www.snopes.com/info/news/menlactate.asp Snopes points out], the headline is a gross distortion of the facts of the case
==See also==
*[[Betteridge's law of headlines]]