Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Unplug the NFL (view source)

Revision as of 23:24, September 26, 2015

677 bytes added ,  23:24, September 26, 2015
There are multiple reasons why losing an NFL team is good for a city, and the first reason is that the NFL bilks taxpayers of billions of dollars. Even though NFL owners are making billions of dollars for themselves, they get taxpayers to foot much of
Line 62: Line 62:     
At least one expert has opined that problem is never going away.<ref>http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/nfl-performance-enhancing-drug-testing-will-get-tougher-ped-testing-tougher-alex-marvez-062515</ref>
 
At least one expert has opined that problem is never going away.<ref>http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/nfl-performance-enhancing-drug-testing-will-get-tougher-ped-testing-tougher-alex-marvez-062515</ref>
 +
 +
== Harmful affect on cities and taxpayers ==
 +
 +
There are "Five Reasons Losing an NFL Football Team is Good for a City,"<ref>http://sandiegofreepress.org/2015/02/five-reasons-losing-an-nfl-football-team-is-good-for-a-city/</ref> and the first reason is that the NFL bilks taxpayers of billions of dollars.  Even though NFL owners are making billions of dollars for themselves, they get taxpayers to foot much of the costs for their stadiums.
 +
 +
There are additional reasons why a city is better off it if loses its NFL team, including:
 +
 +
*more support for college programs, which actually help people
 +
*less blighting of the land
 +
*greater local church attendance
 +
*less traffic jams
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Aschlafly
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,644

edits

Retrieved from "https://www.conservapedia.com/Special:MobileDiff/1173103"

Navigation menu