nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
6,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + +
Debate:The liberal quotient of Conservapedia; what is it? Does it matter? (view source)
Revision as of 22:14, April 19, 2007
, 22:14, April 19, 2007no edit summary
: Oh, but for the purposes of this site, if you don't totally agree with the sysops, you are most certainly a liberal. You have got it, here though; too much on this site relies on this sort of Manichaean dichotomy between 'us' and 'them'. Well done for realising ;).[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]
: Oh, but for the purposes of this site, if you don't totally agree with the sysops, you are most certainly a liberal. You have got it, here though; too much on this site relies on this sort of Manichaean dichotomy between 'us' and 'them'. Well done for realising ;).[[User:Wikinterpreter|Wikinterpreter]]
"Totally agree with the sysops?" Heck, it's obvious that a lot of the sysops don't even agree with each other a lot of the time! [[User:DanH|DanH]] 18:14, 19 April 2007 (EDT)
==Suggesting categories?==
==Suggesting categories?==