Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit, rollback
5,023
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 16:
Line 16: + + + +
→Use metaphors and examples relating to a monarchy, such as references to "king" or "queen", or "majestic": new section
Andy, Efficiency isn't the point at issue with the National Health Service. Not even the most patriotic Brit would claim the NHS is particularly efficient. What they value is its scope: everyone has access to health care at the point of need. I'm not going to change what you wrote because you get so defensive when anyone makes alterations to your writing. But you might want to reflect and choose a more appropriate phrase. [[User:BenjyB|BenjyB]] 17:10, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
Andy, Efficiency isn't the point at issue with the National Health Service. Not even the most patriotic Brit would claim the NHS is particularly efficient. What they value is its scope: everyone has access to health care at the point of need. I'm not going to change what you wrote because you get so defensive when anyone makes alterations to your writing. But you might want to reflect and choose a more appropriate phrase. [[User:BenjyB|BenjyB]] 17:10, 9 August 2010 (EDT)
== Use metaphors and examples relating to a monarchy, such as references to "king" or "queen", or "majestic" ==
Quite amusing, especially in the Biblical context. I assume, Andy, you don't like Rev 17:14, perhaps you'd prefer "President of Presidents" over "King of Kings, Lord of Lords" --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 15:31, 19 October 2015 (EDT)