Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
350,920
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 93:
Line 93: − +
Debate:How should we view the fact leading scientists do not believe in God? (view source)
Revision as of 18:12, October 28, 2015
, 18:12, October 28, 2015→Some big limitations of the consensus among scientists
:Exactly, that's the point. Most leading scientists believe in God. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 11:51, 28 October 2015 (EDT)
:Exactly, that's the point. Most leading scientists believe in God. --[[User:Elessar|Elessar]] ([[User talk:Elessar|talk]]) 11:51, 28 October 2015 (EDT)
== Some big limitations of the consensus among scientists ==
== Some big limitations of the consensus view among scientists ==
Phlogiston theory reigned in science for 100 years and then was shown to be false. Scientific fraud is rampant today and integrity among scientists is at a low ebb. The consensus view among scientists about a particular matter is vastly inferior to empirical science/scientific method (observational science which has been replicated).
Phlogiston theory reigned in science for 100 years and then was shown to be false. Scientific fraud is rampant today and integrity among scientists is at a low ebb. The consensus view among scientists about a particular matter is vastly inferior to empirical science/scientific method (observational science which has been replicated).