Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,850
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: +
→Deleted
:I'm not crazy about the solution I chose—having an article with a singular name and another with a plural name. I welcome suggestions for how to do this right. I suspect that "Wind turbine, with material that the admins don't like removed" and "Wind turbine, with material that the admins don't like included" isn't a very good solution. But we do need to have an article in which, among other things, the free market solution that TXU has followed gets mentioned, perhaps with discussion of why that may or may not be a good idea. Similarly for Walmart's action. Which also may or may not be a good idea.
:I'm not crazy about the solution I chose—having an article with a singular name and another with a plural name. I welcome suggestions for how to do this right. I suspect that "Wind turbine, with material that the admins don't like removed" and "Wind turbine, with material that the admins don't like included" isn't a very good solution. But we do need to have an article in which, among other things, the free market solution that TXU has followed gets mentioned, perhaps with discussion of why that may or may not be a good idea. Similarly for Walmart's action. Which also may or may not be a good idea.
:@Robin: Please do not write things that insult admins or anyone else. It's a really effective way to get yourself banned, and you seem like a smart and useful person. Find a constructive way to describe what you are doing, and how you interact with your friends in describing CP. (My interactions are also, ummm, interesting.) If you want to discuss these issues with me further, without the danger of a 90/10 ban, feel free to contact me at sam4557@gmail.com [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:35, 13 November 2015 (EST)
:@Robin: Please do not write things that insult admins or anyone else. It's a really effective way to get yourself banned, and you seem like a smart and useful person. Find a constructive way to describe what you are doing, and how you interact with your friends in describing CP. (My interactions are also, ummm, interesting.) If you want to discuss these issues with me further, without the danger of a 90/10 ban, feel free to contact me at sam4557@gmail.com [[User:SamHB|SamHB]] ([[User talk:SamHB|talk]]) 01:35, 13 November 2015 (EST)
::I think the two article solution is a bad idea. The uncertain/grey areas which need more research (such as Wind Turbine Syndome) can have pro/con material along with a probabilistic explanation. The current economic viability/subsidization should be cut and dry. Any reasonably expected improvements in the technology which will affect the economics could be researched and written about. In addition, the environmental impact could be mentioned (birds killed vs. less pollutants, etc. etc.). In addition, the politics could be mentioned. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 06:55, 13 November 2015 (EST)