Changes

:Over time English terminology becomes archaic or loses its meaning, and [[liberal bias]] creeps into modern translations.  This project is a good reality check against that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:24, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

:Over time English terminology becomes archaic or loses its meaning, and [[liberal bias]] creeps into modern translations.  This project is a good reality check against that.--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 22:24, 24 June 2014 (EDT)

::It has provided me some useful insight in Bible study when used alongside my New Defenders study Bible and I can imagine it is a great learning resource for those who want to learn more about the Word of God without having to sift through archaic terms in the KJV alone or have to deal with the liberal bias of translations like the NIV and TNIV. This project's nature allows for archaic terminology in the English language to be corrected instantaneously which is much better than having to wait for a new paper edition, and makes an effort to eradicate that creeping liberal bias. I really applaud the effort you and others have put into this to make it what could be an entirely indispensable learning resource. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 17:18, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

::It has provided me some useful insight in Bible study when used alongside my New Defenders study Bible and I can imagine it is a great learning resource for those who want to learn more about the Word of God without having to sift through archaic terms in the KJV alone or have to deal with the liberal bias of translations like the NIV and TNIV. This project's nature allows for archaic terminology in the English language to be corrected instantaneously which is much better than having to wait for a new paper edition, and makes an effort to eradicate that creeping liberal bias. I really applaud the effort you and others have put into this to make it what could be an entirely indispensable learning resource. --[[User:JamesWilson|James Wilson]] 17:18, 27 June 2014 (EDT)

I don't know if it is right for me to say this, but this book of the Bible always bothered me. Firstly, it is about two lovers, not yet married, who want to have sex with each other. It also contains graphic terms to describe the woman and refers to her breasts in a crude term. This makes it uncomfortable for me to have, in case my children read it. I understand there might be some deep symbolic meaning, if there is maybe a radical rewrite might be needed to make it more evident?

I don't know if it is right for me to say this, but this book of the Bible always bothered me. Firstly, it is about two lovers, not yet married, who want to have sex with each other. It also contains graphic terms to describe the woman and refers to her breasts in a crude term. This makes it uncomfortable for me to have, in case my children read it. I understand there might be some deep symbolic meaning, if there is maybe a radical rewrite might be needed to make it more evident?