Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
577 bytes added ,  06:30, April 20, 2007
m
Defending second ammendment
Line 8: Line 8:  
Among their objections to the Constitution, anti-Federalists feared a standing army that could eventually endanger democracy and civil liberties. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful at blocking ratification of the Constitution, through the Massachusetts Compromise they insured that a Bill of Rights would be made, which would provide constitutional guarantees against taking away certain rights.
 
Among their objections to the Constitution, anti-Federalists feared a standing army that could eventually endanger democracy and civil liberties. Although the anti-Federalists were unsuccessful at blocking ratification of the Constitution, through the Massachusetts Compromise they insured that a Bill of Rights would be made, which would provide constitutional guarantees against taking away certain rights.
   −
One of those rights was the right to bear arms.  This was intended to prevent the Federal Government from taking away the ability of the states to raise an army and defend itself.
+
One of those rights was the right to bear arms.  This was intended to prevent the Federal Government from taking away the ability of the states to raise an army and defend itself.  The second ammendement must be protected at all costs, for the sacred right to hold weapons, and kill tyrannical government, is what holds America together and united. Consider if a german had killed Hitler, how history would have proved the second ammendment right. Though it is highly debatable whether it should also apply to muslims and other enemies, which liberals generally support, this is the practice in America as of April, 2007. Theoretically, if a person has the power to take the life of another, other people will not perpetrate criminal offenses against them.
    
==Comments==
 
==Comments==
4

edits

Navigation menu