Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
theories meant to be challenged
Line 7: Line 7:  
|place=Portland, Oregon
 
|place=Portland, Oregon
 
|year=2010
 
|year=2010
−
|pages=139
+
|pages=57, 139
 
|isbn=978-0-89051-597-6
 
|isbn=978-0-89051-597-6
 
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=gvyHquVubDoC}}</ref> Having acquainted readers with theory and empirical findings from ''other'' studies helps substantiate the reasons behind the specific objectives and hypotheses for one's study.<ref>{{cite book
 
|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=gvyHquVubDoC}}</ref> Having acquainted readers with theory and empirical findings from ''other'' studies helps substantiate the reasons behind the specific objectives and hypotheses for one's study.<ref>{{cite book
Line 18: Line 18:  
|pages=225
 
|pages=225
 
|isbn=0-226-52631-3
 
|isbn=0-226-52631-3
−
|url=http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo19910133}}</ref>  
+
|url=http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo19910133}}</ref> If a [[theory]] or point of view is treated, in direct contradiction to [[Socratic principle]], only as a [[doctrine]] to be validated and not one to be challenged, it is not regarded as being [[scientific]].<ref name="Hedtke"/>  
    
==Examples==
 
==Examples==
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu