447
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + + + + + + + + + + + +
no edit summary
Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is "encylopedic". Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page. Also, Bible quotations on the front page? Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible? Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]
Wikipedia also has News on the right side, but most of the front page matter is "encylopedic". Here, today, on the right it is about the madman at Virginia Tech and several references to his Anti Christian Rant - on the right and the left side ... and am sure it will dominate the front page. Also, Bible quotations on the front page? Encylopedia or a platform to push the Bible? Is anything else quotable on the front page? [[User:Seekcommon]]
I know what you mean, shouldn't we wait until the official investigation reveals new facts, instead of immediately politicizing the whole case, I know it's just speculation and I have no tangible evidence for this.
To me it seems that guy was a troubled kid, probably obsessed with unreachable women, who was laughed by his "rich-kid" classmates and felt cornered by his parent's strong religious beliefs and one day decided he wanted to take make the world pay, like those kids from Columbine.
The name Ishmael could be (notice the use of the words "could be" instead of "is") a reference to him recognizing himself in the biblical Ishmael who was rejected by his society, instead of an alledged Muslim connection.
I'd say that's the just about the whole story, no conspiracies against "America" and no evil brainwashing porn.
So yes, propaganda like this and all of the "liberals this and liberals that" crap doesn't belong on the front page of an encyclopedia"
[[User:Middle ManMiddle Man]]