Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
102 bytes added ,  21:36, December 23, 2015
m
Clarity
Line 53: Line 53:     
==Internationally==
 
==Internationally==
−
Traditionally, the ''living constitution'' concept has only been applied to the [[Constitution of the United States]].  However, in recent times it has started to be applied to all constitutions around the globe.<ref>[http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5617&context=fss_papers The Roots of the Living Constitution]</ref><ref>[http://www.ruleoflaw.ca/the-true-american-import-to-canada-is-the-living-constitution-not-originalism/ The True American Import to Canada is the Living Tree, not Originalism]</ref>
+
Traditionally, the ''living constitution'' concept has only been applied to the re-interpretation of the [[Constitution of the United States]].  However, in recent times, questions have started to be asked as to if other constitutions around the globe may also be considered ''living and breathing constitutions''.<ref>[http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5617&context=fss_papers The Roots of the Living Constitution]</ref><ref>[http://www.ruleoflaw.ca/the-true-american-import-to-canada-is-the-living-constitution-not-originalism/ The True American Import to Canada is the Living Tree, not Originalism]</ref>
    
What effect a comparison of countries' constitutions will have on the concept of a ''living constitution'' has not yet been determined, since some constitutions are more solid than others.
 
What effect a comparison of countries' constitutions will have on the concept of a ''living constitution'' has not yet been determined, since some constitutions are more solid than others.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit, move, protect, rollback
9,147

edits

Navigation menu