Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a dozen decisions mentioning RFRA between 1994 and the end of 2015. The U.S. Court of Appeals, meanwhile, has issued close to 2000 decisions mentioning RFRA during this same two-decade period.
Line 16: Line 16:     
Notice that in ''[[City of Boerne v. Flores]]'' (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the RFRA to the extent it applied against the states.  [[Congress]] reacted by passing the [[Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act]] (RLUIPA) in 2000.
 
Notice that in ''[[City of Boerne v. Flores]]'' (1997), the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] invalidated the RFRA to the extent it applied against the states.  [[Congress]] reacted by passing the [[Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act]] (RLUIPA) in 2000.
 +
 +
Overall, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued a dozen decisions mentioning RFRA between 1994 and the end of 2015.  The U.S. Court of Appeals, meanwhile, has issued close to 2000 decisions mentioning RFRA during this same two-decade period.
 
[[category:First Amendment]]
 
[[category:First Amendment]]
 
[[category:RFRA]]
 
[[category:RFRA]]
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,567

edits

Navigation menu