The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has held Rooker-Feldman to be inapplicable where the party against whom the doctrine is invoked was not a party to the underlying state-court proceeding. See ''[[Johnson v. De Grandy|De Grandy]]'', supra, at 1006, 114 S. Ct. 2647, 129 L. Ed. 2d 775. | The [[U.S. Supreme Court]] has held Rooker-Feldman to be inapplicable where the party against whom the doctrine is invoked was not a party to the underlying state-court proceeding. See ''[[Johnson v. De Grandy|De Grandy]]'', supra, at 1006, 114 S. Ct. 2647, 129 L. Ed. 2d 775. |