Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, Moderators, move, protect, rollback, Administrators
27,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 43:
Line 43: + +
Talk:Shroud of Turin (view source)
Revision as of 14:03, December 29, 2015
, 14:03, December 29, 2015→Shroud of Turin: reply to Vargas
::Did you change the Word of God into a lie, Mr. "Muhamad", just to further your own ends? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 07:08, 28 December 2015 (EST)
::Did you change the Word of God into a lie, Mr. "Muhamad", just to further your own ends? [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 07:08, 28 December 2015 (EST)
::::Karajou, you have far from exhausted the misinformation contained in this man's arguments. The next time a new user presents atheistic arguments on a talk page and then tries to defend it on the basis of a dislike of censorship of views, I will be inclined to erase it as irrelevant and make a link here to your arguments as a proof and example of atheistic presentation of misinformation under the cover of Conservapedia's generous willingness to preserve presentations of unpopular points of view. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 04:55, 29 December 2015 (EST)
::::Karajou, you have far from exhausted the misinformation contained in this man's arguments. The next time a new user presents atheistic arguments on a talk page and then tries to defend it on the basis of a dislike of censorship of views, I will be inclined to erase it as irrelevant and make a link here to your arguments as a proof and example of atheistic presentation of misinformation under the cover of Conservapedia's generous willingness to preserve presentations of unpopular points of view. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 04:55, 29 December 2015 (EST)
:::::The problem with people like that is 1) they have the relevant, factual information on this subject that has been done by many scholars and investigators available to them, but they refuse to read it for themselves; and 2) they will instantly believe - also without fact-checking - the statements made by those who are against the veracity of this subject. The bottom line here is that the atheistic community will go all out in presenting Jesus as a mere myth, and they will fight tooth and nail against anything which proves otherwise. They have to push the Shroud as a 13th century painted forgery, period, despite documented and physical evidence to the contrary. [[User:Karajou|Karajou]] ([[User talk:Karajou|talk]]) 09:03, 29 December 2015 (EST)
:Why do you think Conservapedia would seek a Muslim intermediary between themselves and atheists holding demonstratively corrupt standards? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 21:50, 27 December 2015 (EST)
:Why do you think Conservapedia would seek a Muslim intermediary between themselves and atheists holding demonstratively corrupt standards? [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 21:50, 27 December 2015 (EST)