Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
4 bytes added ,  19:19, January 2, 2016
m
Line 6: Line 6:  
The reported cases of [[ex-homosexuals]] had revealed there is no mysterious force at play, natural or [[supernatural]], [[biological]] or otherwise – just a propensity for men and women to delude themselves. The evidence is clear – believing to be ''‘born that way’'' is nothing more than self-delusion buttressed by the ubiquitous ideomotor effect.
 
The reported cases of [[ex-homosexuals]] had revealed there is no mysterious force at play, natural or [[supernatural]], [[biological]] or otherwise – just a propensity for men and women to delude themselves. The evidence is clear – believing to be ''‘born that way’'' is nothing more than self-delusion buttressed by the ubiquitous ideomotor effect.
 
When it comes to [[homosexual]] alias sodomical lifestyle, there is no need for the agency of ''‘gay gene’'' or ''‘gay epi-marks’''<ref>{{cite web |title=Homosexuality May Start in the Womb |author=Elizabeth Norton |publisher=AAAS |url=http://news.sciencemag.org/evolution/2012/12/homosexuality-may-start-womb?ref=hp |date=11 December 2012 |accessdate=2 January 2016 |quote=The "epi-marks" that adjusted parental genes to resist excess testosterone, for example, may alter gene activation in areas of the child's brain involved in sexual attraction and preference.}}</ref>, and the invocation of such agency contrary to [[Occam’s razor]] is the sign of a mind not merely unscientific, but also either uninformed, or, even worse, [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]].  
 
When it comes to [[homosexual]] alias sodomical lifestyle, there is no need for the agency of ''‘gay gene’'' or ''‘gay epi-marks’''<ref>{{cite web |title=Homosexuality May Start in the Womb |author=Elizabeth Norton |publisher=AAAS |url=http://news.sciencemag.org/evolution/2012/12/homosexuality-may-start-womb?ref=hp |date=11 December 2012 |accessdate=2 January 2016 |quote=The "epi-marks" that adjusted parental genes to resist excess testosterone, for example, may alter gene activation in areas of the child's brain involved in sexual attraction and preference.}}</ref>, and the invocation of such agency contrary to [[Occam’s razor]] is the sign of a mind not merely unscientific, but also either uninformed, or, even worse, [[psychological manipulation|manipulative]].  
Despite the fact that nonsensical [[LGBT|LGBTI/gender ideology]] has no more scientific credibility than spiritism, its spectre haunts us even now. It is still reported uncritically in [[mainstream media]]; for example, in 2015, an article titled ''“'Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.”'' popped up in the Guardian.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2015/jul/24/gay-genes-science-is-on-the-right-track-were-born-this-way-lets-deal-with-it
+
Despite the fact that nonsensical [[LGBT|LGBTI/gender ideology]] has no more scientific credibility than spiritism, its spectre haunts us even now. It is still reported uncritically in [[mainstream media]]; for example, in 2015, an article titled ''“'Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.”'' popped up in [[The Guardian]].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2015/jul/24/gay-genes-science-is-on-the-right-track-were-born-this-way-lets-deal-with-it
 
|author=Qazi Rahman
 
|author=Qazi Rahman
 
|title='Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.
 
|title='Gay genes': science is on the right track, we're born this way. Let’s deal with it.
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
2,947

edits

Navigation menu