Changes

==Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis==

==Pattern of liberal vandalism on wikis==

A typical liberal reads an article that contains something they don't agree with, or is about a subject they disagree with. The liberal then decides to remove all content from the page or jokingly inserts parody/nonsense. Liberals understand that their edits will be removed to the original state and they will be blocked from further editing. This pattern repeats itself over and over like a compulsive disorder.

Online Wikis such as [[Conservapedia]] often publish articles which contradict a typical liberal's opinions, which could lead to liberal vandalism. Liberal vandalism on wikis can manifest in multiple ways; a liberal might insert parodic or nonsensical content into an article, or they might simply delete content from the article, partially or entirely. Despite understanding that their edits would be reverted and their user accounts would be blocked, liberal vandals continue to vandalize online wikis.

 

[[Conservapedia]] is freqently vandalized by liberals for challenging their worldview, leading them to insert explicit or misleading content into articles. The vandalism inserted into Conservapedia can mislead readers who don't understand the nature of Wikis into believing that the encyclopedia is "just wacko," despite that not being the case, according to Brian Macdonald, a Conservapedia user who reverts vandalism.<ref>http://articles.latimes.com/2007/jun/19/nation/na-schlafly19/2</ref>

==See Also==

==See Also==