999
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 31:
Line 31: + +
Debate:Are the Democrats capable of fighting terrorism? (view source)
Revision as of 19:55, April 20, 2007
, 19:55, April 20, 2007→YES
::You want CIA to assassinate people.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 19:50, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
::You want CIA to assassinate people.[[User:Jaques|Jaques]] 19:50, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
:What do you do when confronted by scary, shadowy people who have no qualms with killing? Release your own scary, shadowy people who have no qualms with killing on them: the CIA.[[User:Fuzzy901|Fuzzy901]] 18:41, 18 April 2007 (PDT)
:What do you do when confronted by scary, shadowy people who have no qualms with killing? Release your own scary, shadowy people who have no qualms with killing on them: the CIA.[[User:Fuzzy901|Fuzzy901]] 18:41, 18 April 2007 (PDT)
:::Yes. That is how the game is played. Would you rather we line our guys up on one side of the field and wait until they line up on the other? That is what the current administration is doing right now, which is why Harry Reid is right, we've already lost this war. However, I maintain we did not lose it recently--we lost it on 9/12. The way we win is with our shadowy guys versus their shadowy guys. The blunt force of the US military is misspent on this kind of "war." If you play chess, you know your pawns have seldom the chance to catch the queen that, say, a bishop or another queen has. We would do better to match them this way than to keep sending our soldiers out to e targets for their snipers. [[User:Flippin|Flippin]] 15:55, 20 April 2007 (EDT)