Changes

::You know what though, yes, I agree that ABC would have better spent their time pointing out how little evidence there is to support the Swift Boat's claims and showing how members of the group are responsible for the construction of the "official record" that they claim was falsified.  However, that doesnt make the Swifties any more truthful.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 16:22, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

::You know what though, yes, I agree that ABC would have better spent their time pointing out how little evidence there is to support the Swift Boat's claims and showing how members of the group are responsible for the construction of the "official record" that they claim was falsified.  However, that doesnt make the Swifties any more truthful.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 16:22, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Ok, so this should be the first line of investigation, i.e. determining ''exactly'' what SBVT (and by extension, John O'Neill in ''Unfit for Command'') claims are regarding Kerry.  ''ABC News'' would have us believe the dispute concerns things such as who was standing where at the time of gunfire, etc.  If the dispute is primarily over the veracity of documents, would agree ABC has pretty much disqualified itself as a credible source?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:50, 20 April 2007 (EDT)

:::Ok, so this should be the first line of investigation, i.e. determining ''exactly'' what SBVT (and by extension, John O'Neill in ''Unfit for Command'') claims are regarding Kerry.  ''ABC News'' would have us believe the dispute concerns things such as who was standing where at the time of gunfire, etc.  If the dispute is primarily over the veracity of documents, would you agree ABC has pretty much disqualified itself as a credible source?  [[User:RobS|RobS]] 16:50, 20 April 2007 (EDT)