Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
14,282
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + + +
Talk:Natural-born citizen (view source)
Revision as of 10:35, January 19, 2016
, 10:35, January 19, 2016Case against Cruz filed
:It is a worthy debate whether having a non-citizen father should discount a person as natural born. Indeed, in the ''Wong Kim Ark'' court case, US Supreme Court justices Fuller and Harlan disagreed with the majority opinion. However, it is the result as decided by the majority that matters. This case settled once and for all that according to the US Constitution, anyone who is born a citizen under the 14th amendment by being "born in the Us and subject to its jurisdiction" is definitively a natural-born citizen. [[User:SDCrawford|SDCrawford]] 21:36, 31 October 2012 (EDT)
:It is a worthy debate whether having a non-citizen father should discount a person as natural born. Indeed, in the ''Wong Kim Ark'' court case, US Supreme Court justices Fuller and Harlan disagreed with the majority opinion. However, it is the result as decided by the majority that matters. This case settled once and for all that according to the US Constitution, anyone who is born a citizen under the 14th amendment by being "born in the Us and subject to its jurisdiction" is definitively a natural-born citizen. [[User:SDCrawford|SDCrawford]] 21:36, 31 October 2012 (EDT)
==Case against Cruz filed==
Looks like this issue is finally going to federal court.[http://www.fox4news.com/politics/74988790-story] [[User:PeterKa|PeterKa]] ([[User talk:PeterKa|talk]]) 05:35, 19 January 2016 (EST)