1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: − − However, due to so many different kinds or radiometric dating in use (i.e [[Radiocarbon dating]], also called carbon dating, [[Potassium-argon dating]], [[Uranium-lead dating]], [[Uranium-thorium]] and [[Rubidium-strontium dating]]), all of which concur with each other when dating objects, it is extremely unlikely that all of them are wrong in the exact same way. Therefore, support for radiometric dating is virtually universal in the scientific community.
Correct for atheistic/old-Earth bias
Because radiometric dating fails to satisfy standards of testability and [[falsifiability]], claims based on radiometric dating may fail to qualify under the ''[[Daubert]]'' standard for court-admissible scientific evidence. It is more accurate for shorter time periods (e.g., hundreds of years) during which control variables are less likely to change.
Because radiometric dating fails to satisfy standards of testability and [[falsifiability]], claims based on radiometric dating may fail to qualify under the ''[[Daubert]]'' standard for court-admissible scientific evidence. It is more accurate for shorter time periods (e.g., hundreds of years) during which control variables are less likely to change.
== Key implausible assumptions ==
== Key implausible assumptions ==