28
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 353:
Line 353: + +
User talk:Aschlafly/Archive16 (view source)
Revision as of 00:05, April 21, 2007
, 00:05, April 21, 2007→[[Conservapedia:Quality]]
:Which is still much better than Wikipedia: 0.2% "featured" or "good". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:11, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
:Which is still much better than Wikipedia: 0.2% "featured" or "good". --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 11:11, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
:: But a 'start' class (the lowest class other than stub) article on wikipedia is about the same quality as a 'good' article on Conservapedia. For example, on wikipedia, 'Real analysis' is start class, but on Conservapedia, it would be a good article. [[User:NickJ10|NickJ10]] 20:05, 20 April 2007 (EDT)
==[[User:Crocoite%5CNews_Articles|Suggested articles for "Breaking News" on the Main Page]]==
==[[User:Crocoite%5CNews_Articles|Suggested articles for "Breaking News" on the Main Page]]==