Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Political: info added
Line 13: Line 13:  
|2012
 
|2012
 
|Not Rated
 
|Not Rated
|[[Liberal]] haters playing [[conservative]]s in a [[HBO]] movie about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin call it fiction.
+
|[[Liberal]] haters playing [[conservative]]s in an [[HBO]] movie about [[Sarah Palin]]. Many debunked controversies are highlighted in the plot. Both [[John McCain|McCain]] and Palin call it fiction.
 
|NA - TV
 
|NA - TV
 
|-
 
|-
Line 37: Line 37:  
|2004
 
|2004
 
|R
 
|R
|A fawning monument to [[communist]] [[Che Guevara]].
+
|A fawning monument to [[Communist]] terrorist and mass murderer [[Che Guevara]].
 
|$16,781,387
 
|$16,781,387
 
|-
 
|-
Line 67: Line 67:  
|2003
 
|2003
 
|R
 
|R
|Anti-American sequel to Dogville.  Star [[James Caan]] refused to be apart of this describing director Lars von Trier as Anti-American and stated that he himself is an "ultra-conservative".
+
|Anti-American sequel to ''Dogville''.  Star [[James Caan]] refused to be apart of this, describing director Lars von Trier as Anti-American and stated that he himself is an "ultra-conservative".
 
|$674,918
 
|$674,918
 
|-
 
|-
Line 73: Line 73:  
|1969
 
|1969
 
|R
 
|R
|Liberal Propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrong doing.
+
|Liberal propaganda that blames the [[military]] for liberal wrong doing.
 
|$14,283,305
 
|$14,283,305
 
|-
 
|-
Line 79: Line 79:  
|1995
 
|1995
 
|R
 
|R
|A historically inaccurate biography of Richard Nixon directed by liberal filmmaker [[Oliver Stone]].
+
|A historically inaccurate biography of [[Richard Nixon]] directed by liberal filmmaker [[Oliver Stone]].
 
|$13,681,765
 
|$13,681,765
 
|-
 
|-
Line 85: Line 85:  
|2008  
 
|2008  
 
|R
 
|R
|An extremely pro-[[gay]] biography of openly homosexual politician [[Harvey Milk]].
+
|An extremely pro-[[homosexual]] biography of openly homosexual politician [[Harvey Milk]], with [[Sean Penn]] playing the title character.
 
|$31,841,299
 
|$31,841,299
 
|-
 
|-
Line 121: Line 121:  
|2010
 
|2010
 
|PG-13
 
|PG-13
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[communist]] [[Sean Penn]]. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. Typical un-American Hollywood film "The narrative that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses."
+
|Another Bush bash flick starring [[Communist]] Sean Penn. 2010 film rehashes the lead up to the [[Iraq War|war in Iraq]] and [[Valerie Plame]]'s role. Typical un-American Hollywood film "The narrative that [[Karl Rove]] and [[Dick Cheney]]'s Chief of Staff [[Scooter Libby]] were nefarious behind-the-scenes players intent on destroying innocent reputations while pushing the nation into war on false pretenses."
 
|$9,540,691
 
|$9,540,691
 
|-
 
|-
Line 127: Line 127:  
|2008
 
|2008
 
|Not Rated
 
|Not Rated
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[2000 Presidential election]]s and its aftermath in [[Florida]]. A look into how the [[Republicans]] stole the [[election]] and the role of its party members that made it happen. Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.
+
|The 2008 [[HBO]] movie on the [[United States presidential election, 2000|2000 Presidential election]] and its aftermath in [[Florida]], presented from a [[Liberal bias|liberal-biased]] viewpoint. A look into how [[Democrats]] and their [[Mainstream media|liberal media]] supporters claim the [[Republicans]] "stole" the [[election]] and the alleged role of its party members that the Democrats claim "made it happen" (although in reality, it was the Democrats themselves who tried to steal the election for their candidate [[Al Gore]] [[United States presidential election, 2000#Recount|by attempting to commit vote fraud in Florida through ordering selective recounts in Democrat-friendly areas while ignoring Republican-strong areas]], only to be stopped when the US Supreme Court ruled the Democrats' end-run attempt around election rules to be illegal). Republicans are portrayed as ghoulish and cited as manufacturing demonstrations. Both the real [[Warren Christopher]] and [[James Baker]] contend the film's portrayal of the former is hopelessly untrue.
 
|NA - TV
 
|NA - TV
 
|-
 
|-
Line 151: Line 151:  
|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions'')
 
|1999 (''[[The Matrix]]''); 2003 (''The Matrix Reloaded'' and ''The Matrix Revolutions'')
 
|R
 
|R
|Glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s "On Nihilism" chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), as well as containing several hints towards a pro-communist, anti-American/[[anti-Christian]] view, despite the salvation narrative. In addition, the Architect scene tries to give a "devastating critique/twist" to salvation myths with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. This same scene also implicitly compares George Bush Jr. to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world (on the panel of screens in the background.), and featured wars that America was specifically involved in. Far-[[leftist|left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was also hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-Socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. In addition, the first film had throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher that implied that Cipher would become [[Ronald Reagan]] should he succeed in betraying his fellow allies to the Agents in a clear attempt at an anti-Reagan statement.
+
|Glorifies anarchism and [[nihilism]] (even including a brief nod to [[Jean Baudrillard]]'s "On Nihilism" chapter from Simulacra and Simulation), as well as containing several hints towards a pro-Communist, anti-American/[[anti-Christian]] view, despite the salvation narrative. In addition, the Architect scene tries to give a "devastating critique/twist" to salvation myths with the Architect as a malevolent allegorical substitute for the Christian [[God]]. This same scene also implicitly compares [[George W. Bush]] to Hitler during a discussion of evil in the world (on the panel of screens in the background.), and featured wars that America was specifically involved in. Far-[[leftist|Left]] [[race-baiting]] scholar Cornel West was also hired to play a role in the film specifically because the [[The Wachowskis|Wachowski Brothers]] (as they were known at the time) were influenced by his pro-Socialist/Communist and anti-American rhetoric. In addition, the first film had throwaway dialogue between the main villain Agent Smith and the treasonous freedom fighter Cipher that implied that Cipher would become [[Ronald Reagan]] should he succeed in betraying his fellow allies to the Agents in a clear attempt at an anti-Reagan statement.
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
Line 157: Line 157:  
|2013
 
|2013
 
|PG-13
 
|PG-13
|Attacks [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]], portraying the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. Also distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV show and radio show, as dumb-founded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]] as not only the 'star' of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's voice of reason.
+
|Attacks [[capitalist]]s and the [[military]], portraying the former as ruthless, greedy railroad executives and the latter as 'thugs' who support their actions. Also distorts the messages of its source material by displaying the [[Lone Ranger]], shown to be a smart intellectual character in the original TV show and radio show, as dumb-founded and unintelligent, instead featuring his sidekick [[Tonto]] (played by [[liberal]] [[marijuana|pot]]-smoker [[Johnny Depp]]) as not only the "star" of the film, but as the Lone Ranger's voice of reason.
 
|$89,302,115
 
|$89,302,115
 
|-
 
|-
Line 163: Line 163:  
|2007
 
|2007
 
|R
 
|R
|Encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established in America
+
|Encourages the false idea that [[liberalism]] must be established in America.
 
|
 
|
 
|-
 
|-
Line 175: Line 175:  
|2006
 
|2006
 
|PG
 
|PG
|Promotes communism, main message of the movie is the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing.  
+
|Promotes Communism, main message of the movie is the power of the individual to be more powerful than one another is a bad thing.  
 
|$28,142,535
 
|$28,142,535
 
|-
 
|-
Line 181: Line 181:  
|1999
 
|1999
 
|PG
 
|PG
|Espouses anti-war themes and also brief but strong anti-hunting sentiments. Firearms in general are shown in a negative light, with the phrase "guns kill" being repeated a total of three times throughout the film. The titular giant is referred to as a "big gun that walks." Nevertheless, he is a poor metaphor for a real gun - unlike a law-abiding citizen owning a gun, the giant has no choice in his actions; he is an automatic killing machine, programmed with the inability to use his weapons for good, only for senseless destruction. The conclusion of the story is that he learns to hide his weapons and "not be a gun." Then, to protect the public from an incoming missile, he must fly into it and kill himself instead of using his destructive powers against the missle. As it is explained, "It's bad to kill, but it isn't bad to die." Also features some swearing and foul language as well.
+
|Espouses anti-war themes and also brief but strong anti-hunting sentiments. Firearms in general are shown in a negative light, with the phrase "guns kill" being repeated a total of three times throughout the film. The titular giant is referred to as a "big gun that walks." Nevertheless, he is a poor metaphor for a real gun - unlike a law-abiding citizen owning a gun, the giant has no choice in his actions; he is an automatic killing machine, programmed with the inability to use his weapons for good, only for senseless destruction. The conclusion of the story is that he learns to hide his weapons and "not be a gun." Then, to protect the public from an incoming missile, he must fly into it and kill himself instead of using his destructive powers against the missile. As it is explained, "It's bad to kill, but it isn't bad to die." Also features some swearing and foul language as well.
 
|$5,732,614
 
|$5,732,614
 
|-
 
|-
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, edit
7,846

edits

Navigation menu