| Line 26: |
Line 26: |
| | *[http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/candidate.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638 "Barack Obama (D): Candidate summary, 2012 cycle/Source of funds"] (betw. March-June 2013). Opensecrets.org website. 34% Individual contributions, 67% large and corporate. | | *[http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/candidate.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638 "Barack Obama (D): Candidate summary, 2012 cycle/Source of funds"] (betw. March-June 2013). Opensecrets.org website. 34% Individual contributions, 67% large and corporate. |
| | *[http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php "2012 presidential race/Overall spending"] (betw. August-September 2015). OpenSecrets.org website. This special interests count of over $1 billion may have decreased at least since August-Sept. 2015, a time which reflects a grand total of individual contributions of less than $1 billion, but the grand total is presumably incomplete (compare, for example, the subtotal of University of California contributions uncounted from the time before August-Sept. 2015, and which thus ''increased''), has every chance of remaining close to its later grand total of $964 million, and does not include Super PAC contributions, which is ''indirect'' spending. | | *[http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/index.php "2012 presidential race/Overall spending"] (betw. August-September 2015). OpenSecrets.org website. This special interests count of over $1 billion may have decreased at least since August-Sept. 2015, a time which reflects a grand total of individual contributions of less than $1 billion, but the grand total is presumably incomplete (compare, for example, the subtotal of University of California contributions uncounted from the time before August-Sept. 2015, and which thus ''increased''), has every chance of remaining close to its later grand total of $964 million, and does not include Super PAC contributions, which is ''indirect'' spending. |
| − | **([http://web.archive.org/web/20150304050735/http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638 Link to version of this reference] on March 4, 2015 (whose pertinent data which follows was the same back to the time indicated in the first reference) which shows $1,212,245 in contributions to the University of California ''vs.'' $1,350,139 in contributions in the version originally published between August-September 2015)</ref> | + | **([http://web.archive.org/web/20150304050735/http://www.opensecrets.org/pres12/contrib.php?cycle=2012&id=N00009638 Link to version of this reference] on March 4, 2015 (whose pertinent data which follows was the same back to the time indicated in the first reference) which shows $1,212,245 in contributions to the University of California ''vs.'' $1,350,139 in contributions in the version originally published between August-September 2015 and afterwards.)</ref> |
| | | | |
| | The [[liberal claptrap]] that helped elect Obama as president seems silly today. It was claimed, for example, that Obama has millions of followers on Twitter, when allegedly some 70% of them are fake.<ref>Jackson, David (August 24, 2012). [http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/08/obama-has-millions-of-fake-twitter-followers/1#.UDfQVqA2et_ "Obama has millions of fake Twitter followers"]. USA Today website/The Oval blog. See [[USA Today]].</ref> And although the [[lamestream media]] promoted Obama as a great orator, in fact he relies almost entirely on teleprompters for his speeches and press conferences, and at one point even had teleprompters set up for him in a middle school classroom in order to speak to the media. | | The [[liberal claptrap]] that helped elect Obama as president seems silly today. It was claimed, for example, that Obama has millions of followers on Twitter, when allegedly some 70% of them are fake.<ref>Jackson, David (August 24, 2012). [http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2012/08/obama-has-millions-of-fake-twitter-followers/1#.UDfQVqA2et_ "Obama has millions of fake Twitter followers"]. USA Today website/The Oval blog. See [[USA Today]].</ref> And although the [[lamestream media]] promoted Obama as a great orator, in fact he relies almost entirely on teleprompters for his speeches and press conferences, and at one point even had teleprompters set up for him in a middle school classroom in order to speak to the media. |