Changes

::First, something being unquestioned (the consensus argument is not scientific as true science is based on sound evidence/experiments and not merely voting) does not make something true.  

::First, something being unquestioned (the consensus argument is not scientific as true science is based on sound evidence/experiments and not merely voting) does not make something true.  

::Second, from an astrophysicists' website from a 2015 article: "So the broad consensus is that black holes definitely exist. There are some astronomers who prefer to withhold judgment until we resolve the region around an event horizon."  [https://briankoberlein.com/about/ HERE] is a bio of the astrophysicist.  

::Second, from an astrophysicists' website from a [https://briankoberlein.com/2015/08/16/do-black-holes-really-exist/ 2015 article]: "So the broad consensus is that black holes definitely exist. There are some astronomers who prefer to withhold judgment until we resolve the region around an event horizon."  [https://briankoberlein.com/about/ HERE] is a bio of the astrophysicist.  

::So much for your "unquestioned" claim! :)  I empirically showed your claim to be false. Put that in your frontiers of science pipe and smoke it! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (EST)

::So much for your "unquestioned" claim! :)  I empirically showed your claim to be false. Put that in your frontiers of science pipe and smoke it! :) [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 16:39, 8 February 2016 (EST)