Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,729
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 102:
Line 102: +
Talk:Epistle to the Hebrews (view source)
Revision as of 23:23, February 11, 2016
, 23:23, February 11, 2016→A fantastic analysis of authorship
On Dec 22, 2015, Andy Schlafly added this [http://biblehub.com/library/pullan/the_books_of_the_new_testament/chapter_xviii_the_epistle_to.htm link to a "fantastic analysis of authorship"]. This "fantastic analysis" cast doubts on Andy's pet theory, i.e., that Jesus Christ Himself wrote the epistle. For example, you would expect Jesus Christ to know all the temple rituals, while "the author [of Hebrews] makes surprising errors with regard to the Temple ritual"... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 17:43, 11 February 2016 (EST)
On Dec 22, 2015, Andy Schlafly added this [http://biblehub.com/library/pullan/the_books_of_the_new_testament/chapter_xviii_the_epistle_to.htm link to a "fantastic analysis of authorship"]. This "fantastic analysis" cast doubts on Andy's pet theory, i.e., that Jesus Christ Himself wrote the epistle. For example, you would expect Jesus Christ to know all the temple rituals, while "the author [of Hebrews] makes surprising errors with regard to the Temple ritual"... --[[User:AugustO|AugustO]] ([[User talk:AugustO|talk]]) 17:43, 11 February 2016 (EST)
:Setting aside the issue of whether Jesus was the author, in the very next sentence the web page refers to: so-called "errors" and then later says, "No one can reasonably say that these statements are of such a nature as to prove that the Epistle was not written by a Levite.". [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 18:23, 11 February 2016 (EST)