Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, rollback
7,537
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 611:
Line 611: + + + + + +
Talk:Counterexamples to Evolution (view source)
Revision as of 18:17, February 13, 2016
, 18:17, February 13, 2016→Language: new section
:You have a negative attitude. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 20:59, 9 November 2015 (EST)
:You have a negative attitude. [[User:VargasMilan|VargasMilan]] ([[User talk:VargasMilan|talk]]) 20:59, 9 November 2015 (EST)
== Language ==
''"Evolution would result in modern languages having one common ancestral language, and for nearly a century linguists insisted that there must be one. There is not, and linguists now accept that there are completely independent families of languages."''
Ancestral languages were only spoken and not written, so it is very hard to reconstruct them. Writing was invented much later. However is there any proof that linguists accept that there was no common ancestral language?--[[User:JoeyJ|JoeyJ]] ([[User talk:JoeyJ|talk]]) 13:17, 13 February 2016 (EST)