447
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 52:
Line 52: + + + + + + + + +
Talk:Irreducible complexity (view source)
Revision as of 02:01, April 21, 2007
, 02:01, April 21, 2007no edit summary
::Third, there's a legal battle going on about whether evolution or "creation science" or "intelligent design" are scientific, ideological, religious and/or pseudoscientific. People will keep trying to end the discussion by one tactic or another. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 21:11, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
::Third, there's a legal battle going on about whether evolution or "creation science" or "intelligent design" are scientific, ideological, religious and/or pseudoscientific. People will keep trying to end the discussion by one tactic or another. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] 21:11, 15 April 2007 (EDT)
Here's the article on natural selection (I've also given a simple explanation of how natural selection works on the atricle's discussion page).
[[http://www.conservapedia.com/Natural_selection|Natural Selection]]
[[User:Middle Man|Middle Man]]
== Behe's flawed argument ==
== Behe's flawed argument ==